4763: Quad knife tool r=def- a=HiRavie
A new way to slice quads that doesn't make mappers pull their hair out.
To use it, open the quad context menu and click the _Slice_ button, check out the tooltip for more instructions.
Snaps automatically to corners and edges if close enough or to grid.
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [x] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [x] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [x] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: Ravie <65019210+HiRavie@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dennis Felsing <dennis@felsin9.de>
4697: Show key presses in nameplates r=def- a=C0D3D3V
As described in [x](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/issues/4589) the arrows that show the key presses of the players are not visible in many situations, this is now my attempt to fix this by including the arrows in the nametags.
~~Also, I created a new option called `cl_show_direction_below` to show the arrows below the player. We can discuss whether this is useful, or whether it should simply be displayed as before only above the player.~~
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [x] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
https://streamable.com/czk2ht
See also https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/issues/4589
- [x] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [x] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: c0d3d3v <c0d3d3v@mag-keinen-spam.de>
src/game/client/components/chat.cpp: In lambda function:
src/game/client/components/chat.cpp:686:33: error: implicit capture of ‘this’ via ‘[=]’ is deprecated in C++20 [-Werror=deprecated]
686 | auto &&FChatMsgCheckAndPrint = [=](CLine *pLine) {
| ^
src/game/client/components/chat.cpp:686:33: note: add explicit ‘this’ or ‘*this’ capture
4695: Always destroy bullets/lasers on kill when in practice team (fixes#4694) r=heinrich5991 a=def-
to prevent /teleporting back to start line and cheating
Any thoughts on whether to include this for 15.9? I'd say yes.
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: Dennis Felsing <dennis@felsin9.de>
4698: Close wordlist.txt file handle after use r=def- a=ChillerDragon
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [ ] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: ChillerDragon <ChillerDragon@gmail.com>
4675: Remove the totally unsafe editor undo r=heinrich5991 a=def-
Since it causes crashes because another thread just accesses the data.
No one has wanted to fix this, so maybe we should just remove it instead
of having clients crash in editor. I'm wondering how much effort it
would be to make this safe. Would we just have to lock for a short part
or is it basically the entire threaded undo operation that has to be
serialized? (No need for a thread then)
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [ ] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: Dennis Felsing <dennis@felsin9.de>
4684: Init m_NonEmptySince r=def- a=ChillerDragon
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [ ] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: ChillerDrgon <ChillerDragon@gmail.com>
4683: Init m_pNextTraverseEntity r=heinrich5991 a=Jupeyy
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [ ] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: Jupeyy <jupjopjap@gmail.com>
4676: Record player_ready event in teehistorian r=heinrich5991 a=Zwelf
Allows reproducing teehistorian files without lookahead and without relying on PlayerNew messages.
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [x] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- tested with teehistorian deactivated
- [x] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [x] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [x] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: Zwelf <zwelf@strct.cc>
Since it causes crashes because another thread just accesses the data.
No one has wanted to fix this, so maybe we should just remove it instead
of having clients crash in editor. I'm wondering how much effort it
would be to make this safe. Would we just have to lock for a short part
or is it basically the entire threaded undo operation that has to be
serialized? (No need for a thread then)
Mixed up previous and current. This did not show up in testing, because
these two were always true at the same time. I've now debugged it and
manually made specific conditions false to verify that it's working.
Sorry for the mess.
4624: Limit evolving to 3 seconds r=heinrich5991 a=ChillerDragon
Took from upstream
5d44714e92 (diff-597779b4eb51af9adfedd04b8a235afff01091a4ba741daa604cb5cbeda4e3daR1306-R1321)
Fixes client freezes if the server sends funny ticks
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: ChillerDragon <ChillerDragon@gmail.com>
4668: Fix bindings with modifiers r=def- a=Kaffeine
I work on a client for InfClass mod and it is important to have bindings for many situations, so we have to use modifiers (one modifier per bind).
It turned out that bindings (with a modifier) are broken in DDNet since commit 4326d00df9 which changes the implementation to support modifier combinations but it messes up the UI part.
I've considered options to revert the commit or to fix the combined modifiers and bravely 😅 choose the latter way. The code had at least five bugs and fixing e.g. four of them does not help much, making it really hard to say if the fix is correct or not. I had to rename some vars first to make the code readable and now (with the correct names) each fix should seem reasonable.
`Modifier` was confused with `ModifierCombination` in so many places. I do not like the idea of deviating from the `teeworlds` codebase but we already did it here by introducing of combined modifiers. We do not use a stronger type system (enum classes and flag classes) but one thing we can do to give a developer the idea of what is going on is to use the correct variable and argument names at least.
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [x] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
I checked the follow cases:
- Binding of a normal key (e.g. `t`)
- Binding of a sole modifier (e.g. `lctrl`)
- Binding of a key combined with a modifier (e.g. `ctrl+t`)
- Binding of a key combined with many modifier (e.g. `ctrl+alt+t`)
### Before
Bindings with `Shift` modifiers displayed as `Ctrl+`, bindings with `Ctrl` or `Alt` are not displayed at all.
### After
All bindings displayed correctly
but also it is possible to set any crazy binding from UI
Co-authored-by: Alexander Akulich <akulichalexander@gmail.com>
The modifiers order in the UI and console follows the order
of modifier enum items.
The conventional order of the modifiers is: Ctrl, Alt, Shift, GUI (Win, Meta).
Place Shift after Alt to get proper order, e.g.:
Alt+Shift+R (conventional) instead of Shift+Alt+R (weird)
ChillerDragon
