src/game/client/components/chat.cpp: In lambda function:
src/game/client/components/chat.cpp:686:33: error: implicit capture of ‘this’ via ‘[=]’ is deprecated in C++20 [-Werror=deprecated]
686 | auto &&FChatMsgCheckAndPrint = [=](CLine *pLine) {
| ^
src/game/client/components/chat.cpp:686:33: note: add explicit ‘this’ or ‘*this’ capture
4700: Fix integer overflow of snapshot delta item size r=def- a=Robyt3
Fixes
```
src/engine/shared/snapshot.cpp:373:13: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 1661611014 * 4 cannot be represented in type 'int'
#0 0x56377a580246 in CSnapshotDelta::UnpackDelta(CSnapshot const*, CSnapshot*, void const*, int) src/engine/shared/snapshot.cpp:373
#1 0x563779c540d3 in CClient::ProcessServerPacket(CNetChunk*) src/engine/client/client.cpp:1465
#2 0x563779c5a5fc in CClient::PumpNetwork() src/engine/client/client.cpp:1599
#3 0x563779c622ce in CClient::Update() src/engine/client/client.cpp:1769
#4 0x563779c774d2 in CClient::Run() src/engine/client/client.cpp:2112
#5 0x563779c92c74 in main src/engine/client/client.cpp:2712
#6 0x7fbf393bb0b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x270b2)
#7 0x563779b0e15d in _start (/teeworlds/build/x86_64/debug/teeworlds+0x121815d)
```
(Trace is from upstream; the affected code is identical).
## Checklist
- [X] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: Robert Müller <robert.mueller@uni-siegen.de>
4695: Always destroy bullets/lasers on kill when in practice team (fixes#4694) r=heinrich5991 a=def-
to prevent /teleporting back to start line and cheating
Any thoughts on whether to include this for 15.9? I'd say yes.
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: Dennis Felsing <dennis@felsin9.de>
4698: Close wordlist.txt file handle after use r=def- a=ChillerDragon
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [ ] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: ChillerDragon <ChillerDragon@gmail.com>
4680: Add CentOS, RedHat, AlmaLinux instructions and fix build r=heinrich5991 a=def-
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [ ] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: Dennis Felsing <dennis@felsin9.de>
4689: Lower the sound volume even further after #4568 r=def- a=heinrich5991
In my non-representative survey, I found that my own sound settings are
at 9 for global volume and 100 for the rest, and for a newbie, it was ~30
for all settings. This should be equivalent given 0.3*0.3=0.09.
CC #4567
CC #4568
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: heinrich5991 <heinrich5991@gmail.com>
In my non-representative survey, I found that my own sound settings are
at 9 for global volume and 100 for the rest, and for a newbie, it was ~30
for all settings. This should be equivalent given 0.3*0.3=0.09.
CC #4567
CC #4568
4675: Remove the totally unsafe editor undo r=heinrich5991 a=def-
Since it causes crashes because another thread just accesses the data.
No one has wanted to fix this, so maybe we should just remove it instead
of having clients crash in editor. I'm wondering how much effort it
would be to make this safe. Would we just have to lock for a short part
or is it basically the entire threaded undo operation that has to be
serialized? (No need for a thread then)
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [ ] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: Dennis Felsing <dennis@felsin9.de>
4684: Init m_NonEmptySince r=def- a=ChillerDragon
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [ ] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: ChillerDrgon <ChillerDragon@gmail.com>
4683: Init m_pNextTraverseEntity r=heinrich5991 a=Jupeyy
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [ ] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: Jupeyy <jupjopjap@gmail.com>
src/engine/client/backend_sdl.cpp: In function ‘bool BackendInitGlew(EBackendType, int&, int&, int&)’:
src/engine/client/backend_sdl.cpp:305:20: error: ‘GLEW_VERSION_4_5’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘GLEW_VERSION_1_5’?
305 | if(GLEW_VERSION_4_5)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| GLEW_VERSION_1_5
src/engine/client/client.cpp:3861:47: error: ‘INT_MAX’ was not declared in this scope
3861 | if(Start < 0 || Length < 0 || Start > INT_MAX - Length)
| ^~~~~~~
src/engine/client/client.cpp:81:1: note: ‘INT_MAX’ is defined in header ‘<climits>’; did you forget to ‘#include <climits>’?
4676: Record player_ready event in teehistorian r=heinrich5991 a=Zwelf
Allows reproducing teehistorian files without lookahead and without relying on PlayerNew messages.
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [x] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- tested with teehistorian deactivated
- [x] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [x] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [x] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: Zwelf <zwelf@strct.cc>
Since it causes crashes because another thread just accesses the data.
No one has wanted to fix this, so maybe we should just remove it instead
of having clients crash in editor. I'm wondering how much effort it
would be to make this safe. Would we just have to lock for a short part
or is it basically the entire threaded undo operation that has to be
serialized? (No need for a thread then)
4674: Fix evolve limit r=def- a=heinrich5991
Mixed up previous and current. This did not show up in testing, because
these two were always true at the same time. I've now debugged it and
manually made specific conditions false to verify that it's working.
Sorry for the mess.
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: heinrich5991 <heinrich5991@gmail.com>
Mixed up previous and current. This did not show up in testing, because
these two were always true at the same time. I've now debugged it and
manually made specific conditions false to verify that it's working.
Sorry for the mess.
4672: Make the evolve limit more visible r=def- a=heinrich5991
This is to make sure that modders don't start to rely on the fact that
we clamp the evolve duration to 3 seconds.
CC #4624
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: heinrich5991 <heinrich5991@gmail.com>
4576: HTTP Serverbrowser: Quit faster (fixes#4563) r=heinrich5991 a=def-
```
[2022-01-08 09:57:03][serverbrowse_http]: found master, url='https://master1.ddnet.tw/ddnet/15/servers.json' time=54ms
[2022-01-08 09:57:03][client]: disconnecting. reason='unknown'
[2022-01-08 09:57:03][http]: https://master2.ddnet.tw/ddnet/15/servers.json failed. libcurl error: Callback aborted
[2022-01-08 09:57:03][serverbrowse_http]: master chooser aborted
```
Not instantaneous but much faster, depends on how often curl calls the PROGRESSFUNCTION.
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
4670: Lib updates r=heinrich5991 a=def-
curl 7.79.0 -> 7.81.0
freetype 2.11.0 -> 2.11.1
sqlite 3.36.0 -> 3.37.2
ffmpeg 4.4 -> 5.0
websockets 4.2 -> 4.3
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
4671: Update Chinese translations (by cheeser0613) r=heinrich5991 a=def-
<!-- What is the motivation for the changes of this pull request -->
## Checklist
- [ ] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: Dennis Felsing <dennis@felsin9.de>
4624: Limit evolving to 3 seconds r=heinrich5991 a=ChillerDragon
Took from upstream
5d44714e92 (diff-597779b4eb51af9adfedd04b8a235afff01091a4ba741daa604cb5cbeda4e3daR1306-R1321)
Fixes client freezes if the server sends funny ticks
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [ ] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
Co-authored-by: ChillerDragon <ChillerDragon@gmail.com>
4668: Fix bindings with modifiers r=def- a=Kaffeine
I work on a client for InfClass mod and it is important to have bindings for many situations, so we have to use modifiers (one modifier per bind).
It turned out that bindings (with a modifier) are broken in DDNet since commit 4326d00df9 which changes the implementation to support modifier combinations but it messes up the UI part.
I've considered options to revert the commit or to fix the combined modifiers and bravely 😅 choose the latter way. The code had at least five bugs and fixing e.g. four of them does not help much, making it really hard to say if the fix is correct or not. I had to rename some vars first to make the code readable and now (with the correct names) each fix should seem reasonable.
`Modifier` was confused with `ModifierCombination` in so many places. I do not like the idea of deviating from the `teeworlds` codebase but we already did it here by introducing of combined modifiers. We do not use a stronger type system (enum classes and flag classes) but one thing we can do to give a developer the idea of what is going on is to use the correct variable and argument names at least.
## Checklist
- [x] Tested the change ingame
- [x] Provided screenshots if it is a visual change
- [ ] Tested in combination with possibly related configuration options
- [ ] Written a unit test if it works standalone, system.c especially
- [ ] Considered possible null pointers and out of bounds array indexing
- [ ] Changed no physics that affect existing maps
- [ ] Tested the change with [ASan+UBSan or valgrind's memcheck](https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/#using-addresssanitizer--undefinedbehavioursanitizer-or-valgrinds-memcheck) (optional)
I checked the follow cases:
- Binding of a normal key (e.g. `t`)
- Binding of a sole modifier (e.g. `lctrl`)
- Binding of a key combined with a modifier (e.g. `ctrl+t`)
- Binding of a key combined with many modifier (e.g. `ctrl+alt+t`)
### Before
Bindings with `Shift` modifiers displayed as `Ctrl+`, bindings with `Ctrl` or `Alt` are not displayed at all.
### After
All bindings displayed correctly
but also it is possible to set any crazy binding from UI
Co-authored-by: Alexander Akulich <akulichalexander@gmail.com>
The modifiers order in the UI and console follows the order
of modifier enum items.
The conventional order of the modifiers is: Ctrl, Alt, Shift, GUI (Win, Meta).
Place Shift after Alt to get proper order, e.g.:
Alt+Shift+R (conventional) instead of Shift+Alt+R (weird)
The first dimention of m_aapKeyBindings is ModifierCombination
since commit 4326d00df9.
Rename the arguments to make it clear when the arg is a combination
(e.g. the arg value '2' refers to '1 << MODIFIER_SHIFT' instead of 'MODIFIER_CTRL')
This is needed to make the code cleaner and the bugs more obvious.
ChillerDrgon
